This is a fascinating collection of results that demonstrates, once again, that the strongest results in the social sciences are in the genre of 'scientists find strong evidence for something we all already knew.' The maddening aspect of it all is that we must all pretend in public that it isn't true, when it's clear that if society simply accepted this as the way things are and calibrated itself accordingly everyone the general level of societal contentment would be raised considerably.
Of course, if one wanted to ensure the general misery, for instance so as to cultivate hystericization and induced psychopathology, setting up conditions predicated on the precise opposite of obviously true things about human nature would be an excellent way to proceed.
This drafted ('67) 'Nam VFW ('69) rec'd a HS diploma only for the simply the fact that the school principle didn't want to deal w/ me for another year. Sooo . . . what does all this "analytical eruditon" mumbo-jumbo contribute to real "productives/parenting" increasingly exploited/parasitized by the least honorable/productive dregs of social orders: commie woke academics, legisTRAITORS, magisTRAITORS, corp boards/execs, financiers, polluticians and their appointed bureauRATS/knuckle-dragging enforcers? Y'all wouldn't last day in a foxhole, especially w/ me even at 75+, flies and a maggot-infested stinking bloated corpse more tolerable! BARF
When I saw the name Jared commonly used by women, for a second I hoped they were doting on Jared Taylor, but then I snapped back to reality. A guy can dream.
Men, if you want to talk (of course you don't but one sort of intercourse requires another) to woman, learn to navigate the use of the words: Precious, Darling, Cute, Adorable, Sweet. When you understand what a darling haircut is, you're there.
Come on, you don't know why (((people in the movie industry))) are trying to change gender norms? Maybe you should research who pioneered the sex change operations in Germany during the Weimar. I'll give you a hint... they're both from the same tribe!
A lot of psychological gobbledygook that could be boiled down to a couple of basic ideas that all thinking people have noticed, women and men are different and all the social engineering isn't going to change that.
There's some pretty heavy data manipulation going on here. Law for example is female-dominated. Law is a highly abstract field. I believe it was Greer in The Female Eunuch (I don't have the book anymore and I'm too lazy to download) who cynically said that women would make the best generals because they're used to the sight of blood. I suspect that a large majority of abortions are at the instance of women. Whether or not you consider it the taking of a human life, it's close to human. That would swing the homicide statistic by sex around right the other way. Women are overwhelmingly the consumers of antidepressants. In my experience working with addicts I saw over and over how willingly women traded sex for drugs. I consider that men aren’t by nature the more addictive sex.
Vocational preferences are revealed preferences. They are surely far more reliable than a scan of emails for word frequency. :) Mark Perry frequently publishes lists of degree courses and vocational choices by sex which tie up closely. Maybe emails aren’t the usual mode of communication for women on serious topics. Maybe the serious words were drowned out by the flood of ridiculously super-excited words. I’m very skeptical of that study.
As for bar graphs, I have been told by organizations that people-of-color have a spiral thought patterns and think in terms of spiral graphs. I suppose whatever excuse people can think of, they'll run it up the pole and see if anyone salutes. In the story "The Emperor's New Clothes", a small boy finally says that the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes. We need more boys like that to say that today's Diversity Programs are false.
Science: The more equal women are treated in a culture, the larger the gender differences. hmm... So if we want to pretend to gender equity, the best way is to oppress women? Or.... the more equal we pretend to be, the larger the differences... which, over time, logically only can equate to yuge dissatisfaction, disassociation between genders and vastly reduced fertility, and the extinction of Western Civ that provides avenues to explore gender interests, and the rise of Islam in which they do not. Almost makes one think there really IS something to evolution, doesn't it...?
This is a fascinating collection of results that demonstrates, once again, that the strongest results in the social sciences are in the genre of 'scientists find strong evidence for something we all already knew.' The maddening aspect of it all is that we must all pretend in public that it isn't true, when it's clear that if society simply accepted this as the way things are and calibrated itself accordingly everyone the general level of societal contentment would be raised considerably.
Of course, if one wanted to ensure the general misery, for instance so as to cultivate hystericization and induced psychopathology, setting up conditions predicated on the precise opposite of obviously true things about human nature would be an excellent way to proceed.
This drafted ('67) 'Nam VFW ('69) rec'd a HS diploma only for the simply the fact that the school principle didn't want to deal w/ me for another year. Sooo . . . what does all this "analytical eruditon" mumbo-jumbo contribute to real "productives/parenting" increasingly exploited/parasitized by the least honorable/productive dregs of social orders: commie woke academics, legisTRAITORS, magisTRAITORS, corp boards/execs, financiers, polluticians and their appointed bureauRATS/knuckle-dragging enforcers? Y'all wouldn't last day in a foxhole, especially w/ me even at 75+, flies and a maggot-infested stinking bloated corpse more tolerable! BARF
When I saw the name Jared commonly used by women, for a second I hoped they were doting on Jared Taylor, but then I snapped back to reality. A guy can dream.
Men, if you want to talk (of course you don't but one sort of intercourse requires another) to woman, learn to navigate the use of the words: Precious, Darling, Cute, Adorable, Sweet. When you understand what a darling haircut is, you're there.
Come on, you don't know why (((people in the movie industry))) are trying to change gender norms? Maybe you should research who pioneered the sex change operations in Germany during the Weimar. I'll give you a hint... they're both from the same tribe!
A lot of psychological gobbledygook that could be boiled down to a couple of basic ideas that all thinking people have noticed, women and men are different and all the social engineering isn't going to change that.
There's some pretty heavy data manipulation going on here. Law for example is female-dominated. Law is a highly abstract field. I believe it was Greer in The Female Eunuch (I don't have the book anymore and I'm too lazy to download) who cynically said that women would make the best generals because they're used to the sight of blood. I suspect that a large majority of abortions are at the instance of women. Whether or not you consider it the taking of a human life, it's close to human. That would swing the homicide statistic by sex around right the other way. Women are overwhelmingly the consumers of antidepressants. In my experience working with addicts I saw over and over how willingly women traded sex for drugs. I consider that men aren’t by nature the more addictive sex.
Vocational preferences are revealed preferences. They are surely far more reliable than a scan of emails for word frequency. :) Mark Perry frequently publishes lists of degree courses and vocational choices by sex which tie up closely. Maybe emails aren’t the usual mode of communication for women on serious topics. Maybe the serious words were drowned out by the flood of ridiculously super-excited words. I’m very skeptical of that study.
As for bar graphs, I have been told by organizations that people-of-color have a spiral thought patterns and think in terms of spiral graphs. I suppose whatever excuse people can think of, they'll run it up the pole and see if anyone salutes. In the story "The Emperor's New Clothes", a small boy finally says that the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes. We need more boys like that to say that today's Diversity Programs are false.
I love all the charts and data you include here, but that's probably because I'm a guy and interested in examining charts and data tables lol
Science: The more equal women are treated in a culture, the larger the gender differences. hmm... So if we want to pretend to gender equity, the best way is to oppress women? Or.... the more equal we pretend to be, the larger the differences... which, over time, logically only can equate to yuge dissatisfaction, disassociation between genders and vastly reduced fertility, and the extinction of Western Civ that provides avenues to explore gender interests, and the rise of Islam in which they do not. Almost makes one think there really IS something to evolution, doesn't it...?